The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart shows the amount of water use and the table compare how much water consumed in two different countries from 1900 to 2000. Overall, it is clear that water usage rate for all factors agriculture, industrial, and domestic increased over the period of 100 years. Also, the figures for all measures such as population, irrigated land and water consumption in Brazil were significantly higher than the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Looking at the first chart, as can be seen, standing at close to 500 km3 in 1900, the amount of water used for agriculture increased gradually and reached at 3000 km3 in 2000. This figure was consistently higher than the figures of other factors throughout the period of ten decades. On the other hand, although accounting for a similar figure, with 100km3 of water use in 1900, the figure for water use in industries had risen to nearly 1300km3 by 2000, remained slightly higher than the figure for Domestic with a rise of about 400km3 of water use in 2000.
Turning to the second chart, Brazil where had the highest water consumption per person, with 259m3, while only 8 m3 of water consumption in the Democratic Republic of Congo. However, it is logical that the reason why the amount of water consumed in Brazil was higher simply because the population and irrigated land of Brazil were considerably higher which had 176 million of population and 26,500km2 irrigated land, while there were only 5.2 million population and 100km2 irrigated land in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, second, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96498054475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58841739607 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505836575875 0.547539520022 92% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2117732047 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.5 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.125 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174277977544 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087950020602 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672873646995 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127418125692 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366669918207 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.