The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USAbetween 1920 and 2000.

Essay topics:

The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA
between 1920 and 2000.

The provided illustration shows the comparison of birth rates in China and the USA every five years from 1920 to 2000. As is observed from the graph, both of countries had high rate in period 1920-1950 and then decrease slowly from 1955 to 2000.
The birth rates in both USA and China were increasing slightly in 1925. However in 1935 birth rate in China was higher than USA. In 1940 birth rate in China decrease significantly to 5 and maintain the same level in 1945. In the other side birth rate in USA fall to 5 in 1945. In 1950 both of countries had climb dramatically. China reached the peak of birth rate at 20, indicating the amount of babies in China born critically. In the next five years the birth rate in China reduce sharply, when the birth rates in USA reduce slightly.
In conclusion, it can be implied that the birth rate in China was under the USA so far after 1955, whereas China’s birth rate has a dramatic growth in 1945 to 1950

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...China were increasing slightly in 1925. However in 1935 birth rate in China was higher ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...de birth rate in USA fall to 5 in 1945. In 1950 both of countries had climb dramat...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43181818182 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.389067732 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505681818182 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9104441632 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376660112396 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177672080988 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679074315832 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268127487476 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367289968958 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.