The two graphs represent computer ownership in percentage between 2002 and 2010. They also give information about computer ownership by level of education in 2002 and 2010.
In the first graph is evident that the number of PCs buyed from population is increased between 2002 and 2010, with a maximum in 2010 with a percentage of 70%. The same happens in the second graph where the computer ownership is higher in people with a better grade of knowledge. From 2002 and 2010 the number of PCs increased in every education level, that can be related to the central role of technology in recent time. Nowaday everyone has a computer and they use it for surf the Internet, play games and use social network. At the same time, the increase in computer ownership can be related to the fact that a lot of people use a computer at work and they can work also at home with it.
In conclusion, the increase of computer ownership can be related not only to a better level of education, but also to an evolution in society which leads to a major use of PCs in the everyday life.
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location. 67
- The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 84
- The graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children. 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle. Both schools and parents are equally responsible for solving this problem.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for you 73
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of million years 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and they can work also at home with it. In conclusion, the increase of computer ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... major use of PCs in the everyday life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54639175258 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48132572672 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469072164948 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5799148482 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332954492675 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186716065534 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153543317898 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280534450953 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201214265491 0.0819641961636 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.