The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The line graph depicts the patterns of energy consumption between 1980 and 2008 in the Usa, as well as forecasts of utilizing this resource by 2030.
Overall, it is obviously revealed that consumption of energy by fuel comprises of vital sustainable resources, namely: petrol and oil, coal, natural gas and Nuclear which, is projected to experience solely an upward trend throughout the period, while some resources such as: solar and wind as well as hydropower energy is predicted to remain virtually steady over the period.
According to the data, the figure of usage petrol and oil accounted for 35 quadrillion units in 1980, but, this figure is about to increase to well under 50 quadrillion units by 2030. Likewise, the coal was only 15 quadrillion units at the beginning of the period, yet, it is projected that this figure is likely to be doubled by the end of the period. It is worth to mention that the figure for natural gas was 20 quadrillion units and despite some fluctuations by 2010, this trend will level off by 2030 with just under 25 quadrillion units.
With regard to solar and wind, nuclear as well as Hydropower energy, their figures were almost the same which represented a merely 4 quadrillion units, however, their trends is objected to remain steady by the end of the period, except for nuclear power which in turn will undergo a minor growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mption between 1980 and 2008 in the Usa, as well as forecasts of utilizing this r...
^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...izing this resource by 2030. Overall, it is obviously revealed that consumptio...
^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...aled that consumption of energy by fuel comprises of vital sustainable resources, namely: pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, so, well, while, as for, except for, such as, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86382978723 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60258603155 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548936170213 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.4780133942 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.5 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.1666666667 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 5.23603664747 306% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144597336816 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865444930671 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856548607858 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110279432357 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960521295004 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.