The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101.
The line graph shows the data about the number of babies born and people dying in NZ over a period of 100 years.
Overall, a considerable rise can be seen in the number of death and eventually is estimated to overtake that for the figure for birth. Both numbers rose and finally is predicted to remain at a certain level.
In 1901, the number of babies born was just over 20,000, and this was nearly two times higher than the rate of people dying. The number of death was about 90,00, about 11,000 lower than the rate of birth.
The biggest change can be seen in the number of birth which rose dramatically to a peak of nearly 650,000 in 1965 and is expected to drop steadily to around 480,000 in the future. By contrast, the figure for people dying increases slightly to nearly 480,000 and is predicted to finally overtake the number of birth in 2041. In 2101, the figure for babies born is supposed to reach 550000, almost 100,000 more than the number of death.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 73
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 61
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 91
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 67
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50847457627 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.182839119 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3358837053 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149711706169 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073897249512 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583285403615 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929560846242 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400916592586 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.