The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three
companies over a period of 15 years
The chart compares the tonnages of waste discarding from the production of companies A, B, and C from 2000 to 2015.
In general, there were significant changes in the amounts of waste produced by all three companies. While companies A and B tended to cut down in waste output, company C's data reflected a completely opposite producing pattern.
It is clear that although there was an obvious effort in waste reducing, company A still ranked highest when it comes to waste output concern during almost the entire period. This number was 12 tones of waste produced in 2000 and gradually decline to around 8 tones after 15 years, which was still approximately double the output of company B at the same time. Company B appeared to follow a similar trend to reduce waste produced after reaching a peak of roughly 10 tones in 2005. By the end of the period, company B became the lowest waste-producing among threes with only 4 tones output. In contrast, there was a considerable increase in waste produced by company C right at the beginning, turning it from the one which initially produced the least waste into the most waste produced company by the period end, passing company A's waste output even before that.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80861244019 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61712428627 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.329866326 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223499706999 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115359204674 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482433587319 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137664336203 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692443459773 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.