The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

The given line graph provides a comparison of the amount of carbon footprint per capita exhausted in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal over a 40-year period.
From an overall perspective, it is apparent that the volume of carbon dioxide per person in Italy and Portugal witnessed an upward trend whereas the reversed pattern should be observed for these numbers in Sweden and United Kingdom.
According to the data in the diagram, in the beginning, the United Kingdom and Sweden hosted the first and the second rank in emitting carbon dioxide per person, which was more than 10 metric tonnes and around 9 metric tonnes respectively. In the same year, the amount of carbon footprint per capita in Italy and Portugal was merely 4 and 1.5 metric tonnes respective. Noticeably, the amount of carbon dioxide emissions in Sweden reached its peak in 1977, which nearly met the same record as the United Kingdom.
After 30 years from the beginning, these amounts in the United Kingdom and Sweden declined by 2 metric tonnes while the number in Italy was roughly higher than 2 times the initial index. Surprisingly, the volume of carbon dioxide emissions in Portugal made a threefold jump over a 30-year period. At the end of the period, the index of carbon dioxide emitted by a person in Sweden and Portugal had the same pattern. Finally, there is a decrease in the amount of the United Kingdom's carbon dioxide emissions from 11 metric tonnes in 1967 to 9 metric tonnes in 2007 but it still stood at the highest top among 4 nations.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, so, still, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81886792453 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45794531957 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483018867925 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7748111229 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.888888889 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388314252098 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184147498146 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401135374597 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257505103003 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224410121966 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, so, still, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81886792453 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45794531957 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483018867925 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7748111229 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.888888889 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388314252098 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184147498146 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401135374597 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257505103003 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224410121966 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.