The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The given graph below indicates how carbon emission levels changed in 4 European countries in the period from 1967 to 2007 in metric tonnes. As is clear from the infographics, levels of carbon emission displayed erratic behavior. Whereas the United Kingdom and Sweden once dominating followed a downward tendency; Italy and Portugal's CO² emission level experienced the opposite trend.
Carbon dioxide emanation level stood high in the UK at 11 metric tonnes in 1967. In fact, each person in the United Kingdom disсared more Carbon dioxide to the atmosphere among members of four states in the given period. After a relative stability carbon dumping decreased gradually year over year to around 9 metric tonnes in 2007. Meanwhile, the emission level in Sweden stood at 6 metric tonnes per person in 1967, which grew steadily to just over 10 metric tonnes a decade later. Paradoxically, there too CO² levels levelled off to 7 metric tonnes followed by further downfall to roughly 5.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
The per capita CO² production in Italy exceeded 4 metric tonnes in 1967. This figure kept an upward trend almost doubling in 1997 after which it stood static till 2007. Surprisingly, Portugese shared similar pattern in terms of carbon dioxide release. At the beginning of the period the rate of CO² emission in Portugal accounted for 1.5 metric tonnes. However, the CO² level grew more than three times leveling out 5.5 metric tonnes in thirty years' time. This index then remained unchanged with slight reduction until 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The given graph below indicates how carbon emission lev...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ers of four states in the given period. After a relative stability carbon dumping dec...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....5 metric tonnes. However, the CO² level grew more than three times leveling out ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11507936508 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46475214766 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8726973638 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0714285714 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275431367753 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102214486639 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661617350764 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207369352837 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687222974509 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.