The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in weathy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
The bar graph illustrates the average GDP for the three types of countries over a period of 30 years.
In general terms, there was a fluctuation in the proportion of GDP per decade.
It is clear from the bar chart show that in the 1960s, the figures for the wealthy countries accounted highest percentage about 5%. This figure is double that of the non-global countries and three times that of the globalisers countries. Nevertheless, this trend had changed significantly, the percentage of the globalisers's annual GDP doubled nearly 2,9% in the 1920s and there was also increase in the GDP of the non-global countries ( about 3,2%) while the wealthy countries fell considerably ( around 2,9%).
In the 1980s and 1990s, the trend for the wealthy countries continued falling to a low point about 2% at the end of this period. However, the figures for the globalisers increased dramatically to reached a peak at approximately 5% in the 1990s. In constract, the GDP percentage of the non-globalisers fell significantly in 1980s and only rose slightly in 1990s to about 1,4%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'accounted the highest'.
Suggestion: accounted the highest
..., the figures for the wealthy countries accounted highest percentage about 5%. This figure is dou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in the GDP of the non-global countries about 3,2% while the wealthy countries f...
^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the wealthy countries fell considerably around 2,9%. In the 1980s and 1990s, th...
^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... the non-globalisers fell significantly in 1980s and only rose slightly in 1990s to abou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...icantly in 1980s and only rose slightly in 1990s to about 1,4%.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00561797753 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03616733429 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4114820144 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14425855633 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697068785644 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060429436923 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839602083272 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703851674794 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.