The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.
The figure elucidates three sort of spreads’ consumption from 1981, which were margarine and butter, and from 1996, which was low fat and reduced spreads, to 2007. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable alterations occurred for the consumption of butter.
To begin with, there was a significant upsurge for butter’s consumption in the first 5 years in which it, initially, stood at just above 140 and peaked to just below 160 in 1986. Unfortunately, it plunged tremendously, plummeting to well across 40 by the end of the period show. Following the same pattern as butter, the consumption of low fat and reduced spreads experienced a dramatic palpitation between 1996, which made up at well under 20, and 2007, which constituted at well over 60.
In contrast, 1981 to 1991 witnessed a gradual oscillation for margarine’s consumption where it, firstly, upright positioned at well beneath 100 and achieved to 100 in the following 10 years. It, over the next 5 years, remained stable. However, it, unexpectedly, dropped tremendously approximately to 40 in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sort' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sorts'.
Suggestion: sorts
The figure elucidates three sort of spreads' consumption from 1981,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, in contrast, sort of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23295454545 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22350432195 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7092659371 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237820609533 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895788834235 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753427580309 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160813826478 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687571992586 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.