The given graph demonstrates the information about using fish and variety of meat in Europe from 1979 to 2004. The numbers are measuring by grams per person per week.
Overall, it is clear to see, grams in a fish, lamb and beef were decreasing, except chicken within a time span of 25 years.
Now, turning to the details using fish was 60 grams at the beginning of data and fall to under a half. According to the expenditure of lamb and fish, we can observe that eating this food were at a high level (about 150 and 220 grams respectively) in 1979. However, lamb and fish users reduced nearly 2 times till 2004, while the proportion of beef reached in its pick score approximately 230 grams for the individual during a week in1983.
Finally, the chicken was the most popular food, whilst fish the least attractive in a list. The last year of the 70s eating meal with chicken was under 150 grams and by 25 years the digits fluctuated and got the highest level just under a quarter of a kilogram.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47252747253 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39371333769 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6602760959 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127940396923 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060612840982 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563293430439 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077284850765 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446806977389 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.