The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given map illustrates the amount of food and various types of meat utilized in a European nation from 1979 to 2004
In general, it is clear that chicken was eaten most in the second half of the period after the lamb had not been favored. In addition, the opposite was true for beef, lamb, and fish.
Looking at the map more closely, we can see that the amount of beef consumed by citizens in a European nation was the highest at roughly 218 grams per person per week, after which it experienced a slight decrease to 196 grams per one per week in 1989. It followed by lamb was 150 grams in 1979 and in 1989 this amount of consumption dropped to 100 grams. Meanwhile, standing at 140 grams in 1979, the number of chicken took over the dominance of Lamb and beef, reaching about 200 grams in 1989, while the lowest figure for fish was approximately 60 grams in 1979 and a final decrease to 50 grams in 1989.
In the second half of the period, chicken stood in the leading position, at 250 grams in 2004, while the amount of beef decreased by about 50 grams and 70 grams for lamb at the end of the stage. There was no change for fish compared to 1989
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in a European nation from 1979 to 2004 In general, it is clear that chicken was...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30593607306 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20436834467 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51598173516 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.2841588755 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972728956308 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577779787918 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304376211396 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766666718497 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548240298915 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.31 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in a European nation from 1979 to 2004 In general, it is clear that chicken was...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30593607306 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20436834467 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51598173516 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.2841588755 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972728956308 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577779787918 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304376211396 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766666718497 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548240298915 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.31 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.