The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given map illustrates the amount of food and various types of meat utilized in a European nation from 1979 to 2004
In general, it is clear that chicken was eaten most in the second half of the period after the lamb had not been favored. In addition, the opposite was true for beef, lamb, and fish.
The amount of chicken consumed by citizens in a European nation was the second rank at under 150 grams per person per week, after which it took over the dominance of lamb and beef at 200 grams in 1989. In 2004, it topped at almost 250 grams, a rise nearly 50 grams.
During in 1979-1989 , each person each week consummated beef most at roughly 230 to 190 gams, and was almost halved in 2004 ( 100 grams). Similar, lamb consumption was nearly 150 grams in 1979, then gradually fell and reached at over 50 grams at the end of the stage. There was no change for fish compared to 1989
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in a European nation from 1979 to 2004 In general, it is clear that chicken was...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... nearly 50 grams. During in 1979-1989 , each person each week consummated beef ...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch week consummated beef most at roughly 230 to 190 gams, and was almost halved i...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 190 gams, and was almost halved in 2004 100 grams. Similar, lamb consumption was...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, then, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42168674699 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1197773943 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.24621422 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11402293905 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575435434817 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260264366874 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081833572951 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554686417471 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.