The bar graph depicts the information on the methods of waste disposal used by a European country in the year 2005 to 2008. There are three processes mentioned above i.e. Landfill, Burning and Dumping in the sea.
It can be seen that landfills had a decreasing trend while dumping in the sea had an increasing rate of proportion by the end of 2008.
According to the data, Landfills was the most prefered technique to disposed the waste in the year 2005 with the amount of 2000 million tones of waste. On the other hand, the remaining two procedures had an average ratio which comes at 850 and 1200 million tones respectively. In the next year, the share of Landfill falls down by 500 tones and the Burning procedure raised by 250 tones. Additionally, Dumping in the sea had slight increased of 150 tones in their ratio. However, the first two methods witnessed a drastic reduction in aportion of disposal which stands up at 1200 and 750 millionm tones in the year 2008. In the same year, Dumping in the sea become the highest applied method to disbursed the waste which stays up at 1550 million tones.
To wrap up, the government bodies are intrested in protecting Landfills and pollution create through ashes while Dumping in the sea harms marine life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74545454545 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49452292595 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554545454545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3143732491 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164376050139 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782129395413 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148324408675 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121160492023 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146018053758 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.