The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
The line graph compares how many books were read by both genders at Burnaby Public Library between 2011 and 2014.
It is clear that the number of books read by men increased over the period shown. Additionally, there was a significant fall in the figure for women readers in 2014, although women read more books than men from 2011 to 2013.
For men, men readers increase steadily from about 3000 books to 4000 books in the 2011-2012 period. After that, the figure went up rapidly to a peak of 14000 books in 2014 and become the highest figure in the line graph.
For women, the number of books read by women was higher than men from around 5000 books in 2011 to 8000 books in 2012. Then, this figure continues growing significantly to 10000 books in 2013. However, one year later, the figure for women declined sharply by 8000 books in 2014.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 693.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55921052632 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10878611483 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.9456003563 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.625 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487293988723 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220909635615 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116663180487 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321177250296 0.15604864568 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614431299495 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.