The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
The graph shows number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
If we look carefully, as we see, number of books read by men had the lowest by 3000 in 2011 whereas it was 14000, that is peak point in graph, in 2014. In addition, women read 5000 books in 2011 while they read 8000 books in 2014.
To continue with, ıf we look details, number of books read by men was 4000, before the curve increased sharply toward 2013. Number of books read by women was 8000 and it climbed to 10000 in 2013. Surprisingly, women and men read same number of books in 2013 by 10000. After 2013, number of books read by women dropped to 8000 while number of books read by men raised to peak point by 14000 in 2014.
To sum up, during years the curve, which belong number of books read by men, increased even though it was on deep point at first. For the rate of books read by women, firstly, it was high value than men, but in 2014, it was low rate than men.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, whereas, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.15183246073 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.83950776611 2.65546596893 69% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465968586387 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4406205163 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1111111111 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.55754133513 0.215688989381 258% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.311974878783 0.103423049105 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.227977665538 0.0843802449381 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.466207258654 0.15604864568 299% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.274637054254 0.0819641961636 335% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 92.46 61.2550243902 151% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.79 11.4140731707 59% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.25 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.