The graph gives information about how many noise complaints from 4 different areas were received by Environment Health authorities in the city of Newton from 1980 to 1996.
Overall, it can be seen that by 1996, vast noise irritation were coming from homes. Whereas, the least one was from road maintenances.
To begin with, just over 600 noise complaints were coming from road works in 1980 which was the largest record during that time. However, the trend decreased dramatically to about 100 by 1996. Followingly, complaints from housing areas stood around 500 before remaining constant to 400 from 1986 to 1988. But it was not until end of the year which the value tripled to that amount.
Turning to the industry graph line, it showed an upward trend during the 16 year period accounting for 400 to roughly 700. Finally, the fewest complaint noise was from the traffic. Initially, it stood just 300 and remained the same until 1984. After a couple of years later, the number of complaints decreased to 200 by 1986 but the proportion tripled to that amount in the next 18 years. In fact, homes and traffic experienced similar trends throughout the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...noise irritation were coming from homes.Whereas, the least one was from road maintenanc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...noise irritation were coming from homes.Whereas, the least one was from road maintenanc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...ining constant to 400 from 1986 to 1988.But it was not until end of the year which ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, whereas, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59142367437 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8286738595 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156387730043 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640779431745 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673735259755 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111855353127 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079870672626 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.