The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six month period in 2011

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six month period in 2011

The line chart illustrates about question accepted rate through place of visitor informatuon in one urban between january until june un 2011.
Overall, by in person and by telephone was the most higher than by email/letter, whereas in the first period people prefer used letter than used by person. While, that is contrast by people used telephone for question received, at the same time for all categories has been fluctuation in every years.
In january, the amount of enquiries received by telephone indicated around 800 and 1.000, the rate was proved that category most popular than another categories at the same time, while in the second month slightly crashed became 800. However in the period sequantially increased and always stable until the end of time was reached 1.600. In addition, the type of in person represented significant developed, in initial of ther first month the number showed upper 400, and several montg after that steadily increased with rating almost 2.00p, this percentage was the biggest number than the amount of another types.
Furthermore, the percentage of people used email for enquiries accepted was almost 800. Meanwhile, in yhe next month until June illustrated constantly decreased that showed around 200 and 400 in June, this amount was the same with the month before.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-09-01 euphorianmt 84 view
2023-08-03 leuleu28 73 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 67 view
2023-07-08 Mindaghcbai 84 view
Essays by user Desi Sari Ayuni :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
..., by in person and by telephone was the most higher than by email/letter, whereas in the fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...cond month slightly crashed became 800. However in the period sequantially increased an...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stable until the end of time was reached 1.600. In addition, the type of in perso...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19339622642 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54323158165 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561320754717 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9936437254 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121771739762 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517779911414 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297923532867 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714144626889 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368053201116 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.