The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

The line graph illustrates the number of questions collected by the Tourist Information Office from January to June in the year of 2011 in one of the city.

Overall, in the beginning, in-person enquiry was at the least position and it experienced an upward trend, while by telephone and by letter or email questions was at the first and second place. At the end of the period, in-person examination was at the top place and followed by telephone and by letter or email.

On the one hand, during the starting period by telephone was accounted for 900 and then it declined to 800 in February. It gradually increasing till at the end and it reached 1600 except there is a stagnant between March and April with 1000. By letter or email queries, is continuously decreasing throughout the period and in January is just below 800 and at last in May it decreased to just under 400 and remain constant in the subsequent month.

On the other hand, At the initial month in-person enquiry is at the last with around 450 and kept rising over the month. It crossed both queries in March and then rose above 1200 in the month of April. At last, it reached at the top place with around 1900.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l month in-person enquiry is at the last with around 450 and kept rising over the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, second, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60563380282 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48869692379 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511737089202 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6681535308 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172738534255 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739003064743 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833266458702 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124085141167 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943943119906 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.