The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007
The line chart gives information about the number of foreign travelers in three types of areas in a particular nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007.
In general, the coast was the most common place of tourist attraction, while mountainous areas had an opposite trend. Overseas people visiting lake areas had a downward trend.
In 1987, the figure for visiting coast areas accounted for 40,000 visitors, compared to only 20,000 travelers visiting mountainous areas. 10,000 native visitors traveled to the mountains fewer than to the coast, at 35,000 and 25,000 respectively. In the next 10 years, the coast had a significant increase in the number of foreign travelers by 25,000 visitors before outlooking the figure of lake traveling, whereas the number of mountainous areas went up remarkably to 30,000 in 2001. People visiting the coast continually rose to over 75,000, and 35,000 foreign travelers visited the coast of this European country in 2007.
Experiencing the lake area had exactly 10,000 visitors in the first year and continually rose over the first fifteen years, peaking at 75,000 visitors in 2002. This figure then dropped back down to approximately 50,000 people in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tinually rose to over 75,000, and 35,000 foreign travelers visited the coast of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, then, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23036649215 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66688023961 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534031413613 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4682838909 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169745738581 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830981904121 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483606045759 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118695325131 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452900642631 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.