The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph shows how many tourists visited a specific Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
In general, the number of tourists who opted to stay on cruise ships and the island experienced upward trends. Plus, tourists who came to a Caribbean island in total increased considerably throughout the period.
In 2010, the number of visitors that stayed on the island stayed well beyond about 0,75 million people and was twice as many as cruise ships-stayed visitors with nearly 0,25 million people. From 2010 to 2013, there was a fluctuation of around 0.5 million in the number of visitors who stayed on the island; then its figure rose dramatically to 2017 by 1,5 million people. Meanwhile, the number of tourists deciding to stay on ships saw a remarkable growth to 1,5 million people in 2013 before remaining unchanged until 2015. After that, once witnessing a sudden small drop of 0,5 million in 2016, it recovered again in 2017 at 1.5 million. As a result, the Caribbean island welcomed an increasing number of visitors from 1 million people at first and reached around 3,5 million in 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fic Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017. In general, the number of tourists who o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, well, while, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89784946237 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55072824724 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.449011234 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292071825342 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158104897664 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126241029209 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276067642191 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141137683439 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.