The line graph provides information to the ratio of male and female students graduating from universities in Canada throughout a 15-years time period.
Overall, as it becomes evident from the chart the number of both men and women graduates has experienced a significant increase from 1992 to 2007. However, women remained much more interested in higher education, since their percentages have been much higher than the corresponding figures of men during the entire period given.
Looking at the graph in more detail, the percentage of men started at 70,000 in 1992, where it plateaued until 2001. From that point in time and by the end of 2007 male graduates in Canada have been on a constant and gradual rise each year and have peaked at almost 95,000.
With regard to women, although the respective curve followed a similar development, the figures of female Canadians were significantly higher than the ones of men. In particular, the graph started at around 100,000 in 1992 and fluctuated a bit until 2000. Soon after 2000, the ratio of women graduating from universities in Canada has witnessed a dramatic increase and in 2007 has rocketed to nearly 150,000.
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both theseviews and give your own opinion 73
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 69
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 67
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to cooperate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, in particular, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05699481865 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7493479833 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575129533679 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3862535234 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214269548391 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101170417646 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729360033241 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140076097587 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336429723041 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.