The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962,1982 and 2002.
The bar graph provide the information about percentage of immigrants to Australia from UK, newzealand, India, vitenam and itly over the time period of 20 years between 1962, 1982, and 2002.
Overall, maximum percentage of immigrants to Australia in 1962. And minimum percentage in 2002.
After giving a close look on the graph. It is patent that first in 1962 UK and vienam was remainly same, 10 percent . After which there was a down up 5 percent in newzealand and minimum immigrants in India near about 2 percent. After that itly was an increase and reached at the 40 percent. Secondly, in 1982 immigrants was boomed up as compared to 1962. In UK immigrants was above the 15 percent. But newzealand was dip percentage almost 6 percent.
Turning to, in 2002 uk immigrants was above than 15 percent. Then newzealand was went down and reached at 4 percent. After that India was upward trend approximately 14 percent. Next vitenam and itly was 13 and 15 percent and it was reduced as compared to 1982.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n 1962. And minimum percentage in 2002. After giving a close look on the graph. It is...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and vienam was remainly same, 10 percent . After which there was a down up 5 perce...
^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...was went down and reached at 4 percent. After that India was upward trend approximate...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, second, secondly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75862068966 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68216178422 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9231903635 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.1428571429 112.824112599 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4285714286 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232283144691 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110922388074 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114217591886 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23055156106 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142557857769 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.44 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.