The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015.
The given chart provides the information on age distribution in one city in term of attendance music concert over a period of five year.
It is noticeable that people aged from 16 to 24 was the most popular group who joined in music concert among 5 cohorts while the opposite was true for people aged over 75.
As can be seen from the cart, in 2010, 40% people aged from 16 to 24 went to music concert compared to about around 52% audiences 25- to 44-year-old. The percentage off people aged from 16 to 24, 55 to 64 and over 75 rose significantly in 2011, reaching just approximate 55, 30 and 20% respectively. By contrast, the figures for 25- to 54-year-old groups decreased sharply.
From 2011 to 2013, the proportions of people aged from 16 to 24 and 45 to 64 remained a stable trend, while group aged over 75 saw a considerable decrease to 10% in 2013. After a climb to 50%, the figure of 25- to 44-year-old group experienced a stability during the end of period. While the year 2015 witnessed a substantial growth of groups aged from 16 to 24, 45 to 54 and over 75, the figure of people aged from 54 to 64 declined to 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | letrang250191 | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Kimm2903 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | eyraen | 78 | view |
- If a product is good or meets people s needs they will buy it Therefore advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment To what extent do you agree or disagree Agree or Disagree 78
- The number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 89
- Today TV channels broadcast man s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of female students on four different course at one university from 1970 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36966824645 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67760348673 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545023696682 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2007111297 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247154702818 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120346284547 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671189487359 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179559650781 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411876362959 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.