The graph provides information about the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
There are one basic general trend - upward.
First of all, using of CD player increase gradually since 1996 to 2002/03. Likewise, the trend for home computers was upward,
Between 1996/97 and 2002/03 need for computers rose twice. Whereas using of mobile phones grow up significantly: from 17 to 70 percent.
At the same time there was a remarkable fluctuation in the percent of mobile phone’s using between 1998/99 and 2002/03.
It is noticeable that the Internet was inaccessible untill 1998/99 for domestic using. However, utilization of the Internet increased significantly: since 10% to 45% in 1998 to 2002, respectively.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: HOWARDCC
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies? 89
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
...in the UK. There are one basic general trend - upward. First of all, using of CD pl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 640.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 118.0 196.424390244 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42372881356 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.29587325169 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98996745365 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.694915254237 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8069758011 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11733635297 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650853926837 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150259960513 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848854839585 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168627960306 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.