The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK
The line graph provides an outline of the proportion of technologies that are used by the British people from 1996 to 2003.
Overall, it is clear that all of the technologies had an upward trend over the period given, while the CD player recorded by far the highest figure compared to other technological gadgets.
Looking at the line graph, we can see that the CD player increased significantly to achieve at nearly 80%. Meanwhile, the mobile phone had a significant change which rose to above 40%, while the percentage of the home computer was below the mobile phone. Likewise, an increase in the percentage of home computer maintained from 30% in 1996/97 to approximately 55%. Even though the line for mobile phones and home computers narrowed between 2000 and 2001, the home computer couldn't overpass the mobile phone. However, internet access was by far the least percentage compared to other technologies.
In 2003, the CD player had become the most popular technology with more than 80%. Furthermore, the mobile phone rose to peak it's highest figure and become the second most popular gadget while internet access and home computer remained under them, 45% and 59%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-24 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 81
- Is it acceptable to clone humans What is your opinion 56
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of the species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 84
- The number of people interested in cosmetic surgery is increasing in order to improve their physical appearance Why do people do operations to change the way they look Do you think it is a positive or negative development 95
- Many educational institutions give greater importance to subjects related to science and ignore subjects such as drama and literature Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...6 to 2003. Overall, it is clear that all of the technologies had an upward trend over t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...etween 2000 and 2001, the home computer couldnt overpass the mobile phone. However, int...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10204081633 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69700653161 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6330561286 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173397794369 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733238409474 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293021462252 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093409746999 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382278349548 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.