The given graph provide information about the changes in percentage of domestic access to contemporary technology in households in Great Britain between 1996 and 2003.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that all four trends increased gradually during the periods. CD players wear the most available, while the internet was the least from 1998 to 2003.
The CD player started with just under 60% in 1996 and grew steadily to over 80% in 2003. In the beginning of the period the usage of Home computers was approximately 30% and achieved below 60% by the end. Mobile phone illustrated slight fluctuation, but at the same time trend was upward, initiated with nearly 20% and climbed to considerably less than 80%. The internet access became possible in 1998, with around 10%, rose gradually to marginally above 40%.
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 56
- With all the troubles in the world today, money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other things.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 680.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65133452434 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.711111111111 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0231203425 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1428571429 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105532163823 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458624921245 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762146927169 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880380346554 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972794149506 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.