The graph provides information about changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
In 1998/99 year Internet access became successful. It has increase from 15% to 43% in 2003/03 year. By the contrast CD player wich became popular in 1996/7 year was steady fell from 60% to all 81/82%. In 2002/2003 year the former technology had the highest percetages of all technology.
Home computer was popular in 1996/97 year and had upward from 29% to 38% in 2002/03 year. The mobile phone had more percentages that the former technology. Mobile phone fluctuated in 1996/97 from 19% to 1998/99 was about 29%, in this year with home computer had 38%.
The next high percentage of mobile phone is 42%. In 2000/01 had gradually upward to 67%. And in 2002/2003 year mobile phone fell steadily to 70%.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons there relevant. 78
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this change? Good or bad? 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion? 76
- It Is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views 31
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 681.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86428571429 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49361429353 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 179.1 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0539808351 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.9090909091 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.7272727273 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119525053542 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619033064953 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127555055783 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137972453495 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186696978533 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 61.2550243902 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.02 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.