The given bar chart illustrates the uses of internet connection in urban/suburban and the countryside households in a European nation from 1999 to 2004.
Overall, it is clear that an increase trend was observed in internet access in both places. Apart from that, in 2004, both areas used the highest percentage of network connection in household.
To begin with, about 13% of urban/suburban had the internet access in 1999. There was a dramatic growth in the proportion of network users in next three years, which rising from 28% to 49% till 2002. In last second year, the percentage of network access in cities was 51%. It rose by 4% and reached about at 65% in 2004.
Similarly, rural households in European nation had climb trend in internet access. In 1999, it stood at 3% and in 2000 it was 7%. 9% and 14% of internet using in 2001 and 2002. There was a sudden increase in percentage of rural household internet access and stood at 32%.The network connection again rose gradually from 32% to 42% form 2003 to 2004 respectively.
- The graph below shows the total births and the deaths in a European country from 1950 to 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and give comparison where relevant 67
- Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in australia The table shows the amount of dollars spent on various activities per week while the pie chat shows 78
- The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 10
- The chart shows the sports played in Australia in 2003 All figures in percentage 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...sehold internet access and stood at 32%.The network connection again rose gradually...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, similarly, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78888888889 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71632013241 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9762571391 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3636363636 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341884733865 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136882045979 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983789491678 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219054462242 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046207117831 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.