The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The assigned line graph illustrates information regarding the amount of pollution in London over years. Generally, the data is calibrated into micrograms per cubic meter.
At a fleeting glance, it is immensely clear that starting at approximately 1 cubic meter in the very first year, the level of sulfur dioxide in London rosed to 600 during 1650. After one century, it hits the crest at 750 micrograms per m3, from where it followed the zig-zag pattern with vicissitudes between the rates until 1900. Moreover, the declined trend was observed from 1950, the average value stood at 500, eventually, it went down to 0 in the final year.
Further scrutinizing the chart, with regards to smoke, it comprised of 0 m3 in the initial years, which was increased to 200 in 1700 and there was more 250 m3 hike was seen in the next two centuries. After 1990, there was gradual fall had been noticed with fluctuations trend among the values in 1950. Therefore, in the final year, it hits the trough at 0.
Overall, it is lucid that Sulphur Dioxide followed the rising trend in the pollution level of London, while smoke remained constant between the first three consecutive years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...t went down to 0 in the final year. Further scrutinizing the chart, with regards to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hike' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hikes'.
Suggestion: hikes
...o 200 in 1700 and there was more 250 m3 hike was seen in the next two centuries. Aft...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, regarding, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58928561576 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0503850783 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988158907933 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427994481887 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573898448831 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737310025001 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495045213933 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.