The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph gives an insight about the alterations of population in the three distinct countries in the state of Oregon in the united states of America and the horizontal axis indicates over 6 decades period from 1940 to 2000.

It is crystal clear that in 1940, the population of Columbia and Yamhill can be seen very least as well similar , it was around 31 thousand while the population in Washington was highly accounted 75 thousand among all the countries.

Turning to the 1970, the population of Yamhill and Columbia had an approximately familiar growth level of population but when it came to Washington , its population increased rapidly and displayed an escalation of 75 thousand.
Finally in 2000, the growth of population reached the peak point of 250 thousand in Washington whereas the population of Yamhill and Columbia risen gradually.

Overall, the upward adaptations were in the Washington in all the years and the population growth was almost similar in the other two countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l can be seen very least as well similar , it was around 31 thousand while the pop...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...opulation but when it came to Washington , its population increased rapidly and di...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...splayed an escalation of 75 thousand. Finally in 2000, the growth of population reach...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, well, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15757575758 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8431828836 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.5474398666 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.2 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145172463869 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839099705949 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561425891931 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839099705949 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561425891931 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.