The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparusons where relevant.
At fleeting glance the line graph depicts the information regarding four materials were recycled namely paper & cardboard, glass containers, alumininium cans, and plastics during the given time period from 1982 to 2010 in a particular nation. The data is calibrated in percentile.
Overall, the most striking feature apparent from this presentation is that the maximum ratio of paper & cardboard were recycled in 1982. However, the uncausal feature that cannot be ignored that minimum percentage of plastics was first recycled in 1990.
Highlighting the presentation it is clear that, paper & cardboard were followed decreasing trend. While other three materials followed increasing trend. In 1982, the paper & cardboard were recycled 60%. From 1986 to 1994 the figure was fluctuated before rising at peak of 80%. After 1994, the ratio of paper & cardboard were slightly declined by 10%.
Moreover, in 1982, the glass containers were reused 50% but in 1990 it declined by 10%. After 1990, the ratio of recycled glass containers were rising steply three fifth in 2010. Alumininium cans were first recycled in 1986 with 5%. After 1986 it was continuously inclined around half in 2010. Plastics materials were first recycled in 1990 about 5%. After following the year it inclined one - fifth in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rdboard were followed decreasing trend. While other three materials followed increasi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ns were first recycled in 1986 with 5%. After 1986 it was continuously inclined aroun...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s were first recycled in 1990 about 5%. After following the year it inclined one - fi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37745098039 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69493940798 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3324324242 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.1333333333 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228304620687 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810057767645 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613655518009 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153608927109 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044659794235 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.