The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The individuals percentum of senior citizens from 1940 to 2040 of three nations is being depicted by line graph.

To start with, in the initial year the proportion was 5% but then it steadily went down and reached near three percent in 1960, remained constant till 1985. After this period, it started inclining and will go upto 10% in 2022. Furthermore, there would be a sharp increase in percentile of elder people which will end up at above 25% in last year and this would be at top notch.

Moving to rest two countries percentage of populace, Sweden and USA had minor difference in the proportion of people in 1940.It can be clearly seen that both followed same trend till 1998, then surprisingly in USA above 65 people percentage got 20% in 2018. This will face fluctuations and end up at 25%. On the other side, Sweden almost remained constant and will be below 25% in last mentioned year.

To sum up, percentage will increase significantly in future and Japan had lowest in starting year and will be at peak in proportion of aged people.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...e 25% in last year and this would be at top notch. Moving to rest two countries percen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries percentage of populace, Sweden and USA had minor difference in the prop...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...nce in the proportion of people in 1940.It can be clearly seen that both followed ...
^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... remained constant and will be below 25% in last mentioned year. To sum up, pe...
^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... To sum up, percentage will increase significantly in future and Japan had lo...
^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd Japan had lowest in starting year and will be at peak in proportion of aged pe...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, then, to start with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69189189189 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54820006943 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627027027027 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2877434729 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0885200073415 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406819512667 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418152702883 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674215923374 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387996920552 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.