The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This diagram demonstrates variations of average life lengths of people according to their attachment to a certain region or country. The age of 65 an over is allocated as the main criterion for determining whether people in that specific country tend to live long. Period of time which is analysed in this graph is the interval between 1940th and 2040th year. Countries in comparison are Japan, Sweden and USA.
According to the data provided, in the year 1940 Japan had the least percentage of population aged 65 and over (5%), which was almost twice less than in USA. However, it should be noted that this quantity in Japan has started to grow steeply, and after 1 century it ended up at nearly 27% which was the highest in the year 2040, when compared to USA and Sweden. As regards the latter (Sweden), the numbers has always been in the medium level, ranging from 7% to 25%, with the substantial breakaway from US and Japan in the period between 2000 and 2020. Considering USA it would be interesting to indicate its stable growth tendency, as it hasn’t shown rapid growth in the proportion of old aged people, which Japan and Sweden has faced, according to the information.
Eventually, it can be concluded that indicators in all three countries were in the process of sufficient increase throughout the discussed period. Thus, all in all, the number of people aged over 65 has gradually risen, but with different pace and margins in every mentioned country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'Period'.
Suggestion: Period
...hat specific country tend to live long. Period of time which is analysed in this graph is the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84523809524 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60910510583 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6593117869 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.1 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148683552481 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577444322463 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425256294074 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975927740234 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103885806614 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.