The following line graph compares about goods transported in UK between 1974 and 2002 using four distinct transportation system. Units are measured in million tonnes.
It is apparent that goods transportation increased through all kinds of modes over the period shown. A vast majority commodity transferred via roadway where pipeline experienced the least choice of mode.
In 1974, around 70 million tonnes goods transported by road where pipeline route used to carry goods below 10 million tonnes. The figures for goods moved through water path and rail path accounted as 40 million tonnes and slightly below 40 million tonnes respectively.
By 2002, after giving a regular fluctuation road way still hold the first position for goods transport and hit a high of nearly 100 million tonnes. On the contrary, a dramatic rise noticed for in pipeline modes over the period and reached at around 21 million tonnes. A downfall trend observed in rail system up to 1982 then showed a vacillation till 2002. Water system arrived at around 60 million tonnes goods transport in 1982 and maintained a steady state till 1994. After eight years in 2002 it reached to just over 60 million tonnes.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...portation system. Units are measured in million tonnes. It is apparent that goods tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
... million tonnes. It is apparent that goods transportation increased through all ki...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd maintained a steady state till 1994. After eight years in 2002 it reached to just ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, still, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11282051282 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59929692613 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0720304193 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6363636364 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225679324973 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936212940462 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833913283374 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160867712195 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665959029671 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...portation system. Units are measured in million tonnes. It is apparent that goods tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
... million tonnes. It is apparent that goods transportation increased through all ki...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd maintained a steady state till 1994. After eight years in 2002 it reached to just ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, still, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11282051282 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59929692613 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0720304193 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6363636364 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225679324973 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936212940462 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833913283374 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160867712195 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665959029671 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.