The information about the quantities of goods transported in the United Kingdom from 1974 to 2002 by various types of transport is depicted by the rendered line chart. The data has been calibrated in million tonnes.
To begin with, 70 million tonnes of goods transported in 2974 by road. However, there was a fluctuating increase observed in the proportion of goods transported between 1974 and 2002, it accounted for 98 million tonnes. In 1974, the quantities of goods transported by water and rail were similar, which were nearly 40 million tonnes. Moreover, there had been drastic increase seen in the figure of goods transported by water until 1990. After that, in 1998, it was increased by 25 million tonnes.
Moving towards, from 1978 to 2002, a dramatic increase was seen in the quantities of goods transported by rail, it comprised to 42 million tonnes. In 1974, 5 million tonnes of goods were transported by pipeline. There had been dramatic increase seen in the quantities of goods transported in 2002, it was 22 million tonnes.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the highest proportion of goods transported in the UK by road throughout the span.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... chart. The data has been calibrated in million tonnes. To begin with, 70 million to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97461928934 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79005939835 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467005076142 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5568165072 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0909090909 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256218798969 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125207704837 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721097962753 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183219809529 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387061008075 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.