The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the number of British audiences who used television and radio thoughout the day in 1992.
Overall, The graph depicts that, radio used in morning time more than night time. In contrast, television watched in night with the highest number more than morning.
In this chart, we can see that, 0% respondents watched tv at 6.00 a.m. while 8% of people listened radio in that time. Significantly, the number of radio listeners had increased at around 28% in 8 a.m.
However, that time slightly rose the number of people who watched television at approximately 8%.
From 8 a.m. till 2 p.m. of midnight time, the trend of percentage of uk populations, whom listent radio had drastically decreased at 2%. On other hand, from the noon, audiences of televisions surprisingly rose till 8 p.m. After, 10 p.m., the number of audience for TV sharply fell at 4% within the time of 2 p.m. Around 6 a.m. audience of radio and television slightly increased at 4%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing. In this chart, we can see that, 0% respondents watched tv at 6.00 am while ...
^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of people who watched television at approximately 8%. From 8 am till 2 pm o...
^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll at 4% within the time of 2 pm. Around 6 am audience of radio and television sl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78313253012 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82025521083 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.3480244168 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13490366745 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681945432269 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053011107742 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870135584138 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05686097243 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.