The graph below shows the top priorities by business companies in the USA in 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates, the highest five different priorities as per the size of the companies in USA in the year of 2016. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, most significant priority was converting contacts and increasing number of contacts while, the least priority has given to reducing the cost of contact in all the employees over the given period.
Converting contacts and number of contacts increased over zero to 200 employees account for more than 70 % in 2016. Whereas, which decreased to employees number over 200 to 66% and 62% respectively. Whilst, increased revenue derived from existing customers and providing ROI of marketing activities comprise of below 50% in companies with employees number up to 200. Where as which may increased when employees number escalating over 200 with 55% and 58% each.
Moreover, reducing the cost of contact prioritized below 30% in all the given size of companies which is company with employee under 25 has mere 20%. Similarly as per the size of the company increasing the number of contacts figured as 79% in employees with 26 to 200 over the given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar graph illustrates, the highest five different priorities as per the si...
^^
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...illustrates, the highest five different priorities as per the size of the compan...
^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...d providing ROI of marketing activities comprise of below 50% in companies with employees n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...panies with employees number up to 200. Where as which may increased when employees numb...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ny with employee under 25 has mere 20%. Similarly as per the size of the company increasi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0972972973 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75621938323 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4013595679 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101263036502 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515002171027 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552145349316 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822680048931 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513014036896 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.