The line graph elucidates the information about the percentage of unemployed people in the US and Japan during March 1993 to March 1999.
It is evident from the given line graph that in March 1993 the unemployment rates were high with 7.0%. in US, whilts in Japan it was almost 2.0 percent. However, the proportion of unemployment reduced by 2.5 % in March 1995 and remains approximate same for next two year. On contrary, percentage of work force was increased in Japan and reached to 3.5 % with some fluctuations in March 1996.
Leaping further, it is vivid from the line graph that in the year 1997 rate of unemployed people went down to 5.0 percent in US and in Japan it was increased to 3.5%.Furthermore, after one year unemployment rate in Japan becomes 4.0% and in US rates were reduced to 4.5% in March 1998. Interestingly, in March 1999 unemployment rate becomes same in Japan and US that is 4.5 percent. Afterthat, rate of unemployment start increasing and US was decreasing over the time period.
Overall, it can be said that the ratio of unemployed people in Japan was increased each year. Whereas, US managed to control the unemployment problem with the time. However, initially Japan had less unemployment rate than the US.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...unemployment rates were high with 7.0%. in US, whilts in Japan it was almost 2.0 p...
^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...S and in Japan it was increased to 3.5%.Furthermore, after one year unemployment rate in Ja...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eople in Japan was increased each year. Whereas, US managed to control the unemployment...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87264150943 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86762493623 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.1045920331 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9090909091 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351214016229 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165412782454 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950753123829 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263226496559 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771657598487 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.