The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph line illustrates, the national wide recycling rate of US, between 1960 to 2011,while, data was presented in both million tons and percentage.
Overall, in beginning years, there is slightly change in waste recovery but, after 1980, US made dramatic increase till 2011. Despite of this, still significant proportion of waste is un-recycled.
According to the graphline, in 1960, 5.4 million tons of garbage was recycled , which is 6.4% of wastage production of this year. Recycle process was mildly decrease in 1965 and after that there is slightly increase in graph till 1985. While, in 1970, 6.6% of trash was recycled and increased by almost 3% in 1985, which indicate 16.7 million tons garbage. After 1985, there is dramatic increase rise in graph of recycling, while, 86.9 million tons of trash was recycled , which is 34.7% of whole trash in 2011, hence, this is the highest percentage of till 2011.
As the graph indicates, where US recycled 86.9 million tons, but, this is only 34.7% of whole trash production of country. As the data suggests, still about 75% of garbage was un-recycled in US.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and percentage. Overall, in beginning years, there is slightly change in waste...
^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...5.4 million tons of garbage was recycled , which is 6.4% of wastage production of ...
^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...f this year. Recycle process was mildly decrease in 1965 and after that there is slightl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 86.9 million tons of trash was recycled , which is 34.7% of whole trash in 2011, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02162162162 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57398738893 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.81516822 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15072336512 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731768116056 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354856865204 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104807527089 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294363303961 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.