The given line graph represents how much sweetener was available in the United States over a 45 year period.
In total, sweetener availability increased until around the year 2000 before it receded. The amount of refined cane and beet sugars decreased and then plateaued. Corn sweeteners increase consistently until 1982 and then steadied before beginning to fall from around 1999. The availability of honey and edible syrups remained relatively low and stable over the period.
From 1966 to 1985, refined cane and beet sugars and corn sweeteners followed a very different trend. The sugars started at around 100 pounds per person while corn sweetener started at around 18 pounds per person. By 1985, however, the two sweeteners met at approximately 62 pounds. From there they diverged again before meeting meeting again in 2007 at around 63 pounds. In contrast to sugars and sweeteners, honey and syrups barely changed. They started at around 15 pounds each and by the end of the period were almost the same.
Sweetener availability in the United States increased until around 1998 before decreasing
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: meeting
.... From there they diverged again before meeting meeting again in 2007 at around 63 pounds. In c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21348314607 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58446506345 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 14.3439882878 43.030603864 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3333333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177322794364 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701480606495 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056316138805 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123069669042 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203404688627 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.