The line graph illustrates information about the yearly income of three bakeries (Bernie’s Buns, Lovely Loaves and Robbie’s Bakery) in London from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, there was a significant increased in the income of Lovely Loaves and Robbie’s Bakery. On the other hand, the money earned by Bernie’s Buns decreased considerably.
In 2000, the average amount of money earned by Bernie’s Buns was the highest with over 80.000 pound in comparison with that earned by Lovely Loaves and Robbie’s Bakery. There was nearly 60.000 pound in the income of Lovely Loaves and about 20.000 pound on each bakery. Over the period of the next five years, while the annual earning of Bernie’s Buns fluctuated substantially, Robbie’s Bakery’s income had a gradual fluctuation during three years from 2000 to 2003 but then remained stable of nearly 40.000 pound. At the same time, the figure for income of Lovely Loaves stood steady over 40.000 pound.
In 2005, the proportion of Bernie’s Buns still held the leading position. As can be seen from the graph, the money earned by Bernie’s Buns significantly decreased nearly 40.000 pound and became the bakery with the lowest amount of consumption. On the other hand, the yearly income of Lovely Loaves increased steeply and had the highest gross sales in 2010 with over 100.000 pound. Lower, the selling of Robbie’s Bakery rise rapidly over 60.000 pound.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d Robbie's Bakery. There was nearly 60.000 pound in the income of Lovely Loa...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... five years, while the annual earning of Bernie's Buns fluctuated substantia...
^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same time, the figure for income of Lovely Loaves stood steady over 40.000 p...
^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hand, the yearly income of Lovely Loaves increased steeply and had the highest gr...
^^
Line 7, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver 100.000 pound. Lower, the selling of Robbie's Bakery rise rapidly over 6...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3711790393 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90082573665 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467248908297 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8387584223 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.818181818 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121408279855 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577208811235 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689071932609 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106458370969 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856257099992 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.