The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
This graph illustrates the ratio of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a nation.
The rate of recycling of glass containers and aluminum cans showed a significant rise in the table. While the the recycling rate of paper cardboard decreased. And plastics’ recycling rate experienced only a slight increase in the period.
In the year 1982, glass containers and paper recycling rates were at 50% and 65% respectively. Later, in the period of 1990-1994, both experienced a growth of 10% and 15%. .The recycling rate of aluminum cans began showing an upward trend in the year 1986 till it reached 45% in the year 2010. The recycling rate of plastic increased slightly starting from the year 1990 until it reached 10% by the end of the timeframe.. In the meantime, the highest recycling rate was that of paper and cardboard at 70% followed by glass containers at 60%.
- It is common practice for some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and or travel What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of this 56
- Some people think it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Many feel that being fully present in the moment is more valuable than thinking of the future in terms of both nations and their residents In my opinion this claim is untrue and shortsighted Firstly countries must look to the future to ensure the safe flo
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 wor
- Happiness is often considered difficult to define Why is this What factors determine happiness 61
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 153 200
No. of Characters: 714 1000
No. of Different Words: 80 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.517 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.667 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.691 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.897 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.125 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.493 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.678 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.153 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4