The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This Line graph visualizes the number of people traveling in an underground station in London which also showcase additional information comprises of it.
Usually, the Line graph has two relative aspects of the data. Likewise, here also they took passengers count and the Time from 6:00 to 22:00 which shows the number of people travel at a particular time. These passengers numbers were taken in an underground station in London. At 8:00, There were around 400 people using this underground station But at 6:00 and 16:00 there were few in number nearly 100. Along this graph, It was more fluctuated and don't have any steady number unlike in a few hours between 11:30 and 14:00.
The given line graph which starts increasing in the early morning, decrease after 8:00 and again start to increase after 10:00 but not as same at the beginning of the day. After a few hours of the increase, it starts to keep up a steady plateau for two hours. Although, There was a more fluctuation found in post-mid-time on comparing with the pre-mid-time. Even Though it got to fall after 18:00, After it reaches the 20:00 it starts to rise up. Despite the number it comprises that there were also some passengers are there who travel in the late night. At the last hour also the number is not at all less than the starting number.
To summarise this graph, Even they have more variation in their count, It always maintains a much count in spite of their time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...ch also showcase additional information comprises of it. Usually, the Line graph has tw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passengers'' or 'passenger's'?
Suggestion: passengers'; passenger's
...ople travel at a particular time. These passengers numbers were taken in an underground st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'number'.
Suggestion: number
... at a particular time. These passengers numbers were taken in an underground station in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: few
...tation But at 6:00 and 16:00 there were few in number nearly 100. Along this graph, It was mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: FEW_IN_NUMBER[1]
Message: Use simply 'few'.
Suggestion: few
...tation But at 6:00 and 16:00 there were few in number nearly 100. Along this graph, It was mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... this graph, It was more fluctuated and dont have any steady number unlike in a few ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...keep up a steady plateau for two hours. Although, There was a more fluctuation found in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 92, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...ion in their count, It always maintains a much count in spite of their time.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, so, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74015748031 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4254397056 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9233549571 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6153846154 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169768449416 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739234601601 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749482916397 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122097902157 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691665661633 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.