The diagrams provide data on the male and female working status in six different jobs in Fredonia in two separate years-1975 and 1995.
As is seen, the graphs illustrate progress of empowering women in the work field over 20 years, even the number of females exceeded the males in some work fields.
According to the graph, the number of employed man was considerably more in all sectors than women in 1975. For instance, approximately 650 men were employed in manufacturing related job compare to 300 women per thousand of total employees in the same sectors. In other sectors, the Numbers of male workers were much higher than female workers but in communication male were a bit ahead of women. However, this scenario had plummeted over 20 years, and women did a significant progress in their professions. For instance, in communication around 600 women were employed compare to 300 men per thousand of total employees. Without this, the numbers of female worker surprisingly rose to nearly 500 in 1995 compare to roughly 100 per thousand in 1975. Except from the public sector women hold the trends of progress compare to man. In 1975 only about 40 women worked in defense sector and that grew to more than 100 per thousand after 20 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'significant progress'.
Suggestion: significant progress
... plummeted over 20 years, and women did a significant progress in their professions. For instance, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ress in their professions. For instance, in communication around 600 women were e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90094339623 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6372396421 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7774010809 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.9 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205699235761 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918137689224 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569713156748 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134301007313 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319013818169 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.