The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.

The two graphs represent the difference in male and female employment in the Republic of Freedonia from 1975 to 1995.

Overall, female employment in most sectors rose a substantial amount over the given period, while male employment remained relatively constant.

In 1975, men and women employed in manufacturing numbered around 650000 and 300000, respectively. This sector experienced no change in employment 20 years later. Similarly, the public sector (non-defence) also remained stable for both sexes, with a difference of nearly 200000 between them.

In contrast, by 1975, female employment in communications rose dramatically from almost 300000 to nearly double, while finance and banking saw a three-fold increase. Public sector (defence) comprised the least number of women in both periods, at just a little under 100000.

On the other hand, male employment remained stagnant in the manufacturing, communications, wholesale and retail, and public sector (non-defence) sectors. Male workers in finance and banking slightly increased from a little over 400000 to just under 450000, while the public sector (defence) saw a small drop in male employees by the end of 1975.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mployment remained relatively constant. In 1975, men and women employed in manuf...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60893854749 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96980844158 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0281097389 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351491869549 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151820387828 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113539256187 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219981676682 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11674235269 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.