The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features.
The data elucidates the preferences of owners of cell phones about various features in their devices in the years 2006, 2008 and 2010. The information is provided in percentage.
The most striking feature is the rise in usage of internet. While no data was available for the first year, there was a boost of 32% from 2008 to 2010. Although, all the customers made phone calls in the former years, a slight reduction has been noticed in 2010.
Another feature witnessing significant upsurge was video recording from 9 to 35 in the latter years. While taking photos showed a constant increase of 5% in each of the given years, the percentage change doubled from 2% to 4% in case of text messages. However, playing games showed a fluctuating trend as it rose dramatically at first from 17 to 42, after which there was a little decline.
Overall, the usage of most of the features has shown an elevation, the one used by maximum number of people was calling whereas playing music was the least operated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | ililmaidatuz | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | Shohru_x | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-19 | Forhad Hossain Rabbi | 73 | view |
- The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features 78
- graph ielts writing task map 56
- Some people argue that if children behave badly their parents should accept responsibility and also be punished for the behavior of their children Do you agree or disagree with the statement 82
- Some people say that it is a waste of time to plan for future It is more important to focus on present Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think studying in groups is better while some think self study is better for school students Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...formation is provided in percentage. The most striking feature is the rise in us...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5623076334 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.895237577 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161592386863 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602409247589 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580738042224 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977100737946 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513567983937 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.