he chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar chart illustrates the five preferred country to immigrate by British people. Namely, Australia, New Zealand, USA and France from 2004 to 2007.
Overall, Australia was by far the most favored country of destination by British immigrants over the period of four years, while New Zealand and USA were the least number of British Migrants in 2004 to 2007.
As we can see in the given chart, the number of British migrants in Australia in 2006 were well beyond than the average of four other countries. About 52,000 British settler in Australia during this period. However, there was a decline in the number of migrants in 2007 which is approximately 6000 migrants, this is almost similar in terms of the proportion in the past two years (2004 - 2005), which is just below 44,000 migrants. On the contrary, Australia maintained the most favorite destination of British migrants among 4 major countries.
Spain ranked the second country of choice by British migrants as well as France in 2005. Their average number in Spain from 2004 to 2006 was almost the same which was just above 30,000 migrants. This is exactly similar in France in the year 2005 with approximately 33,000 migrants.
This two country were practically the same migration rate in the year 2007 in Spain and France in 2006 which was just beneath 30,000 immigrants.
Additionally, New Zealand was the third popular country among British newcomer yet there is slow decline with the number of migrants during the period of four years. It decreased from 33,000 to 20,000.
USA, New Zealand including France in 2004 were almost similar with the number of migrants which beyond 15,000 British migrants.
The USA in 2005 got the lowest level of British immigrants among the five mentioned countries, identical to France in the year 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...f British migrants in Australia in 2006 were well beyond than the average of four ot...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, third, well, while, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 302.0 196.424390244 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03973509934 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50810317439 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430463576159 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5034212262 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.466666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101683790803 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461829013219 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298780615066 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626956394251 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351812663822 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.