It is true that due to the global dependence on non-renewable energy resources, it is suggested that people seek those energies in isolated areas. Despite the obvious advantages of this trend, I would argue that these are outweighed by the disadvantages.
On the one hand, there is one major benefit when people exploring oil and gas in untouched areas which is solving the lacking of fossil fuels. In remote areas, there is an abundance of non-renewable sources. By exploiting those areas, people can use those resources to deal with the global demand for the shortage of oil and gas. For example, the UAE which used to be a desert is now one of the biggest fossil fuels export countries in the world.
On the other hand, I believe that the drawbacks are more significant than the benefit. One reason for that view is the environmental problems of exploiting the energy resources. To exploit the untouched areas, people need to remove barriers such as trees or grasses which can disturb the balance of the eco-system. As the environment is damaged, humans will be the next victim. The pollution created by exploiting sources exerts harmful impacts on humans’ health such as respiratory problems, and digestive disorders, all of which will spread on a large scale and leave far-reaching consequences for the next generation to resolve.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the disadvantages of this searching for fossil fuel in remote areas are more significant than the advantage due to the harmful effects on both the environment and humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s for the next generation to resolve. In conclusion, it seems to me that the d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03100775194 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86914923046 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9544561027 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293326144426 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864177754798 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061533849199 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152018200159 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411329144651 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.