The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given
The line graph illustrates the percentage of cinema attendance in the UK by age groups between 1990 and 2010.
At first glance, it was noticeable that the percentage of every age groups had fluctuated in the aforesaid period. it seems that the older generation had enjoyed watching movies than the younger people, as the aged of 44-54 had remained the highest percentage. Moreover, people who had gone to the cinema in every group age had dropped in the same period, which was started from 1995 to 2000.
As the graph demonstrates, we know that the percentage of every group had risen, but the group of age 44-54 had surged the most. In 1990, almost 38% of the aged of 44-54 citizens had gone to the cinema, however, for the next 15 years, people from this group had risen to over 50%. In addition, in this 20-year period, both groups of aged 14-24 and 34-44 had almost the same surge, which was approximately 15% to 21% and 37% to 42%. Furthermore, cinema attendance from aged 24-34 had increased by 9% in this period.
To sum up, it was evident that youngster had lesser demand on watching movies than the old age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...UK by age groups between 1990 and 2010. At first glance, it was noticeable that ...
^^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...had fluctuated in the aforesaid period. it seems that the older generation had enj...
^^
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, which was started from 1995 to 2000. As the graph demonstrates, we know that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43004115191 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.1602042678 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0650283687658 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433143056142 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635861249652 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680980330456 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082936481011 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.